How much does status competition lower Korean fertility?

 [[{“value”:”Using a quantitative heterogeneous-agent model calibrated to Korea, we find that fertility would be 28% higher in the absence of the status externality and that childlessness in the poorest quintile would fall from five to less than one percent. We then explore the effects of various government policies. A pro-natal transfer or an education tax
The post How much does status competition lower Korean fertility? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.”}]] 

Using a quantitative heterogeneous-agent model calibrated to Korea, we find that fertility would be 28% higher in the absence of the status externality and that childlessness in the poorest quintile would fall from five to less than one percent. We then explore the effects of various government policies. A pro-natal transfer or an education tax can increase fertility and reduce education spending, with heterogeneous effects across the income distribution. The policy mix that maximizes the current generation’s welfare consists of an education tax of 22% and moderate pro-natal transfers. This would raise average fertility by about 11% and decrease education spending by 39%.

Here is the full paper by Seongeun Kim, Michèle Tertilt, and Minchul Yum.  Here is the version forthcoming in the AER.

The post How much does status competition lower Korean fertility? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

 Economics, Education, Law, Uncategorized