[[{“value”:”Doctors were given cases to diagnose, with half getting GPT-4 access to help. The control group got 73% right & the GPT-4 group 77%. No big difference. But GPT-4 alone got 92%. The doctors didn’t want to listen to the AI. Here is more from Ethan Mollick. And now the tweet is reposted with (minor)
The post Model this appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.”}]]
Doctors were given cases to diagnose, with half getting GPT-4 access to help. The control group got 73% right & the GPT-4 group 77%. No big difference.
But GPT-4 alone got 92%. The doctors didn’t want to listen to the AI.
Here is more from Ethan Mollick. And now the tweet is reposted with (minor) clarifications:
A preview of the coming problem of working with AI when it starts to match or exceed human capability: Doctors were given cases to diagnose, with half getting GPT-4 access to help. The control group got 73% score in diagnostic accuracy (a measure of diagnostic reasoning) & the GPT-4 group 77%. No big difference. But GPT-4 alone got 88%. The doctors didn’t change their opinions when working with AI.
The post Model this appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.
Data Source, Education, Medicine, Science
Leave a Reply