ChatGPT vs. the experts (Department of Uh-Oh)

 ChatGPT’s answers are generally considered to be more helpful than humans’ in more than half of questions, especially for finance and psychology areas. Most of all, ChatGPT does better in terms of concreteness.  Note also that ChatGPT uses more nouns and deploys a more neutral tone than do the human experts.  ChatGPT fares worst in
The post ChatGPT vs. the experts (Department of Uh-Oh) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. 

ChatGPT’s answers are generally considered to be more helpful than humans’ in more than half of questions, especially for finance and psychology areas.

Most of all, ChatGPT does better in terms of concreteness.  Note also that ChatGPT uses more nouns and deploys a more neutral tone than do the human experts.  ChatGPT fares worst in the medical domain, but its biggest problem (from the point of view of the human evaluators) is giving too much information and not enough simple instructions.  Hmm…  In any case, here is the link.

I wonder how well the upgrades are going to do.

The post ChatGPT vs. the experts (Department of Uh-Oh) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

 Data Source, Education, Science, Web/Tech 

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Prev
What should I ask Simon Johnson?

What should I ask Simon Johnson?

 Other than “why don’t you have a better Wikipedia page?

Next
Willingness to pay for upper-caste status

Willingness to pay for upper-caste status

 How much are individuals willing to pay for privileged status in a society with

You May Also Like