The evolution of nepotism in academia, 1088-1800

 [[{“value”:”We have constructed a comprehensive database that traces the publications of father–son pairs in the premodern academic realm and examined the contribution of inherited human capital versus nepotism to occupational persistence. We find that human capital was strongly transmitted from parents to children and that nepotism declined when the misallocation of talent across professions incurred
The post The evolution of nepotism in academia, 1088-1800 appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.”}]] 

We have constructed a comprehensive database that traces the publications of father–son pairs in the premodern academic realm and examined the contribution of inherited human capital versus nepotism to occupational persistence. We find that human capital was strongly transmitted from parents to children and that nepotism declined when the misallocation of talent across professions incurred greater social costs. Specifically, nepotism was less common in fields experiencing rapid changes in the knowledge frontier, such as the sciences and within Protestant institutions. Most notably, nepotism sharply declined during the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, when departures from meritocracy arguably became both increasingly inefficient and socially intolerable.

That is from a new paper by David de la Croix & Marc Goñi.  Via the excellent Kevin Lewis. 

The post The evolution of nepotism in academia, 1088-1800 appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

 Data Source, Education, Science, Uncategorized